Using Resident Scrutiny to drive housing and care accountability
Added on 07/02/2013
5 (595 user ratings)
As part of our series of recent thinkpieces looking at user involvement and citizen engagement, this new Housing LIN case study No 65 by independent consultant Phil Morgan reviews an innovative approach used by Central and Cecil to promote resident scrutiny of both housing and care services, using techniques drawn from housing to promote bottom up accountability to tenants and service users.
How useful was this article?
(1 is not useful, 5 is very useful)
This resource appears on the following page(s):
Also of interest
- Community Involvement in planning Extra Care in Brighton & Hove
- Growing Older Together: The Case for Housing that is Shaped and Controlled by Older People
- The Dreams and Needs of Housing for the Elderly - Findings from a user study on two sheltered housing schemes in Finland
- An uncertain age
- Assisted Living Platform - The Long Term Care Revolution: A study of innovatory models to support older people with disabilities in the Netherlands